Showing posts with label calories. Show all posts
Showing posts with label calories. Show all posts

Monday, April 6, 2009

Five hour energy

Have you seen those new ads, proclaiming five hour energy with only four calories? Let's see, four calories is about 3 minutes worth of energy. That means you, the buyer are four hours and fifty seven minutes short. 

I guess now you will tell me you do get a boost from that little bottle? That may well be true. There is about as much caffeine in the bottle as in a regular cup of coffee. As for the decaf version of five hour energy? Well, now you are on your own, this is as placebo as they come. 

What about the other ingredients you ask? Well, a bit of vitamin B and some amino acids isn't going to make a difference one way or another.

If you need five hours worth energy, how about a serious meal?

Some updates:
Thursday an 8.5 mile run up Broadway Terrace
Friday, an Ironman distance swim
Saturday, a 42 mile ride to Castro Valley
Sunday, I went to the Napa Valley Dirt Classic with Alistair. I didn't race but I rode a little bit. Afterwards I swam 1.25 miles.
Today I ran 8.7 miles on the backside trail.



Wednesday, January 14, 2009

Trainer

I rode for an hour on the trainer today. Tightened up the wheel a bit and the tire did not slip so there was no jerky movement this time. Much better. I burned 925 calories according to the Ergomo. My average wattage was 235. Makes me wonder about the stationary bike at the club where I can burn 1,100 calories in 45 minutes. Something is not right. 

Yesterday was a very busy day. With the investor meeting in the city I had no time for exercise. Also had a mishap with a flat tire on the highway and that took up part of my morning. I took a day off--first day off this year. 

Meanwhile the weather is just superb. We are hitting new records and day time temperatures are in the upper sixties to low seventies. The only drawback here at the house is the gusty winds. Unlike earlier, the winds are warm now and they contribute to our dry and hot weather.

Thursday, November 27, 2008

Toe surgery and watts


First things first. If you look at yesterday's post you can see I banged my toenails pretty bad in the Ironman. But looks are deceptive. I think my right big toe is fine. I clipped the nail yesterday and some fluid came out but it immediately cleared the nail. I don't think it is separated so it will probably recover. The left one is different. That one is actually black (not so obvious in the shot), and was lifted up by a rather large hematoma. I punctured it yesterday and let out lots of fluid. But the nail did not clear, and the nail bed is still elevated. That one will go I think.

Next, some data. I downloaded the numbers from my Ergomo. I recorded 5:19:20 on the bike. The overall official time was 5:21:04. It took some time to get the device started. During those 5.33 hours I averaged 215W. Compare that to Landis' infamous "testosterone" ride in the Tour, where he averaged 280W for 5.5 hours. The difference between me and Landis is a 65W bulb for 5.5 hours.

However, Landis' 280 were worth quite a bit more. I weighed 172 lbs. and Floyd was probably more than 15 pounds lighter. Looking at the pictures you can see he is also a lot more aero. The picture you see is about the best I can do.

Other numbers: 75 RPM average, 20.7 speed average, 407 W max, and 101 max RPM. Top speed 32.8 mph. Estimated calorie loss 4,428. Altitude gain, 1,549 or about 500 per lap (which compares well to the published data). My normalized power was 225NP. If one thing, it showed I was very steady and did not do crazy stuff. The closer NP is to real average, the more "even" the ride was.

The official data reads: lap 1, 21.34 mph, lap 2, 20.5 mph, and lap 3, 20.97 mph, total 20.93 mph. That too compares well with my recordings. The bike leg moved me up from 1,518 to 533, meaning I passed almost 1,000 people on the bike. In my age group I moved from 85th to 20th or 65 places. I gained another 77 / 6 in the run.

Adding 4,000 calories for the swim and the run, I must have burned somewhere near 8,500 calories. I ate one bagel and some banana bread for breakfast, about 15 gels on the bike, and one powerbar. I estimate another 600 calories in sports drink on the bike, and 600 in Cola on the run. My total intake was close to 3,500 calories for the event. Net loss is somewhere around 5,000. I made up half of that with margaritas and drinks after the event. Cheers!

25 mile mountain bike ride today. Felt great and good fun too.

Tuesday, July 29, 2008

Calories and energy (once again)

The other day I was offered an energy drink sample "without calories." It happened at the expo for a major race. I was in a good mood, the drink tasted fine and the sales person was upbeat. So I decided to ask a stupid question: how can the drink have energy without calories? The friendly sales person did not get the joke. He seriously tried to help me by talking about carbohydrates, fats, and the like. It fell short.

Desperate, and suspecting he missed something important, he referred me to his expert colleague who pondered the same question. We had a bit of a back and forth and the "expert" finally agreed there was a minor problem "in my way of looking at things."

Well, he said, look at it this way, the drink does not contain energy, it releases your energy. There you go. My energy was trapped in my body. It could even make me fat if I was not careful. My body was good at storing energy, yet when it came to using it, it underperformed. No wonder we have so many obese people?

My energy was screaming to be released, apparently in vain. And that is why his company had developed this miraculous drink. So I could use the energy stored in my body. It is amazing what one can hear at health expos. Athletes must be very gullible indeed.

Energy and no calories. The trick? Caffeine.

At the risk of spoiling the fun, I want to just clarify a few issues.  A calorie is a unit of energy, much like a inch (or a meter) is a unit of length and a pound (or a kilogram) is a unit of weight. When you say a food contains energy but no calories you make no sense. It is like saying my arm is long but has no inches, or my backpack is heavy but has no pounds. If a drink has zero calories it has no energy. Ergo, it is not an energy drink.

Nobody requires special stuff to burn energy. We do it continuously. It is essential to life. If you cut off my energy supply I die. Right away. Every cell in a body needs a continuous energy supply. You cut it off and it's game over. Not all cells are equally demanding however, and some can use energy anaerobically (i.e. without oxygen). Ironically enough, the cells that transport oxygen (the red blood cells) are anaerobic cells. No fair stealing the cargo!

Here is another trick question that is often asked in physiology exams: how long does it take for your brain to die when there is no glucose? Hint: Brains are very energy intensive and they can only use glucose under normal conditions.

Most people think it takes a while. A few hours maybe? So, let's ask the question a different way, how long does it take for your brain to die without oxygen? That is better you say, everyone knows it takes only a few minutes (three minutes is often used). 

Have you ever wondered what your brain does with the oxygen? It oxidizes sugar (glucose). No sugar is equivalent to no oxygen. 

What throws people off is that everyone knows you have to breathe all the time to stay alive, but you don't have to eat nearly as frequently -although some seem to have missed the latter rule. The reason you don't need to eat all the time is because you can store substrate (fuel) but not oxygen.

There is glucose floating around in your blood all the time. The level of glucose is constant and your liver keeps it that way. It is a tightly regulated system and only your brain can use glucose at any time. The rest of your body has to do with fatty acids.

To keep glucose levels constant, your liver has access to plenty of stored glucose in the form of glycogen. If the glycogen runs out, the liver can regenerate sugar from protein. It can keep going like that for a day or two. Fortunately, that is rarely called for and most people eat 3-4 meals a day to replenish the stores.

Should trouble arise, there is another fallback mechanism. The liver can produce ketones from fat. Although you can and do make fat from sugar there is no way back.

During times of starvation, your brain can switch to ketones and stay alive. At the same time, your metabolism is throttled back too. All these combined give you several weeks to months worth of survival if needed. 

However, as any diabetic can tell you, if your blood sugar (glucose) level drops by even a small amount, you can go in coma and die rather quickly. The reason diabetics know this is because they have access to a rather powerful drug called insulin. And they have to measure their insulin carefully because insulin can play havoc with your glucose levels in a heartbeat. All diabetics experience hypoglycemia at least once in their lives. It is a rather unpleasant and potentially deadly experience that requires quick intervention lest it be fatal.

The latter also explains why so-called "hypoglycemic" attacks in otherwise normal individuals who do not inject insulin, are nonsense. Nonsense too are the prescriptions not to eat sugars before exercise lest you suffer from a bout hypoglycemia minutes later. Some extend this to simple sugars (versus the "healthier" complex carbohydrates) or to sugars and coffee. All of it is nonsense.

It is often explained in the following way: you eat too much sugar so you get an insulin response with an overshoot and then you start shaking and feel weak because of hypoglycemia. Unfortunately, there is no evidence for it whatsoever. Although it may sound plausible, it is not. Blood glucose levels are not to be messed with. Remember, no glucose is equivalent to no oxygen. No room for sloppy behavior here. No room for "a bit of an overshoot."

Not convinced? Ever seen evidence of people going in coma with convulsions after eating too much candy?  It does not happen. If it did, the US population would decrease rather quickly.

As for the complex carbs, it is another popular myth. Complex carbs are absorbed as simple sugars. It takes marginally longer to do, but the difference is irrelevant.  Carbohydrate breakdown in the gut is incredibly fast. Furthermore, as far as the blood is concerned, the only "visible" sugar here is glucose.

No evidence for fiber either. Absorption with or without fiber appears equally quick. Some have shown evidence that the presence of fiber may accelerate uptake instead of slowing it down.

In short, all the talk about glycemic index is pseudoscience. It is not even clear that the stated glycemic index of a particular food item is accurate.

There is only one thing to remember about carbohydrate. Too much makes you fat. And it does so because it is easy to eat carbs and to keep eating them. If you only eat carbs you are very likely to over-eat. And that is not good. Put some cream cheese on your bagel !